Disposed

K.N. Fayaz Ahmed S/O Khaja Nawas v. Union of India Rep. by Seretary to Gov. Ministry of Home Affairs and Ors.

Bombay HC16 Apr 2024WP/5264/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought directions to lift Look Out Certificates restricting foreign travel. Respondent's communication clarified no restriction was imposed on travel abroad; only requirement to undergo Customs checks on entry and exit. Court disposed of petitions with that clarification.

What did the court decide?

Clarification that no travel-abroad restriction existed; LOC required presentation before Customs officials on entry/exit; petitions disposed of.

K.N. Fayaz Ahmed S/O Khaja Nawas vs Union of India Rep. by… — Customs and Excise | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

507&508-asia-8916-2024+.doc

¶2

Gitalaxmi

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8916 OF 2024 IN

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 5264 OF 2024

¶6

K. N. Fayaz Ahmed } .. Applicant In the matter between : K. N. Fayaz Ahmed } .. Petitioner

¶7

: Versus :

¶8

The Union of India & Ors. } .. Respondents

¶9

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8917 OF 2024 IN

¶10

WRIT PETITION NO. 5263 OF 2024

¶11

Abdul Latif Abbas } .. Applicant

¶12

In the matter between : Abdul Latif Abbas } .. Petitioner

¶13

: Versus :

¶14

The Union of India & Ors. } .. Respondents

¶15

Mr. Shravan Kochar i/b Mr. Tanmay Sangani for the Applicants/Petitioners. Mr. D. P. Singh for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Vijay Kantharia a/w Ms. Maya Majumdar for Respondent No. 4.

¶16

_____Page No. 1 of 3 ____ 13^th May 2024

¶17

507&508-asia-8916-2024+.doc

¶18

Gitalaxmi

¶19

Coram : Sandeep V. Marne & Dr. Neela Gokhale, JJ. (Vacation Court) Dated : 13^th May 2024.

¶20

P.C. :

¶21

1. These petitions are filed seeking direction against Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to lift the Look Out Certificates/Prohibitory Orders made against the Petitioners and to permit the Petitioners to travel abroad without any hindrance.

¶22

2. Mr. Kantharia, the learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No. 4 would place on record the communication dated 13^th May 2024 issued by the Deputy Commissioner in the office of Commissioner of Customs, CSM International Airport, Mumbai, in paragraph 7 of which, the following remark is made :

¶23

“ As the total value of smuggled goods was more than fifty lakhs, LOC (Look Out Circular) request was issued against both the passengers i.e. Mr. Abdul Latif Abbas and Mr. Fayaz Ahmed Khaja Nawas. However, the said request did not suggest any restriction to be put on the petitioners’ travel abroad. The only action expected from immigration check point was to handover the petitioner to Customs official on duty whenever he enters and leaves India to ensure that he is subjected to Customs Check so as to prevent him from carrying any contraband goods. Copy of the request letter addressed to immigration authorities is enclosed for ready reference. ”

¶24

3. Thus, the communication dated 13^th May 2024 clearly indicates that no restriction is put on the Petitioners’ travel abroad. Only restriction is for the Petitioners to present themselves before the Custom Officials whenever they enter or leave India to ensure that they are subjected to Customs Check.

¶25

4. Since no restriction put on the Petitioners’ travel abroad, nothing further remains to be adjudicated in the present petitions. However, it is

¶26

_____Page No. 2 of 3 ____ 13^th May 2024

¶27

507&508-asia-8916-2024+.doc

¶28

Gitalaxmi

¶29

clarified that Petitioners shall present themselves before the Custom Officials on duty at the time of entry as well as leaving India to ensure that they are subjected to Customs Check.

¶30

5. With the above clarification, the interim applications as well as writ petitions are disposed of.

¶31

[ Dr. Neela Gokhale, J. ]

¶32

[ Sandeep V. Marne, J. ]

¶33

GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR

¶34

Digitally signed by GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR Date: 2024.05.14 17:06:08 +0545

¶35

_____Page No. 3 of 3 ____ 13^th May 2024

K.N. Fayaz Ahmed S/O Khaja Nawas v. Union of India Rep. by Seretary to Gov. Ministry of Home Affairs and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.N. Fayaz Ahmed S/O Khaja Nawas v. Union of India Rep. by Seretary to Gov. Ministry of Home Affairs and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Prajakta S. Pande vs SBI General Insurance Company Limited

Prajakta S. Pande vs SBI General Insurance Company Limited

Dinesh Motilal Gupta vs the General Manager Brihanmumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking

Abdul Latif Abbas S/O Abbas vs Union of India Rep. by Seretary to Gov. Ministry of Home Affairs and Ors.

Ajit Ramchandra Patil and Anr. vs the National Highway Authority and Ors.

Abdul Latif Abbas S/O Abbas vs Union of India Rep. by Seretary to Gov. Ministry of Home Affairs and Ors.