Criminal writ petition in which neither the petitioner nor his advocate appeared or took steps since July 2017; the court concluded the petitioner was not interested in pursuing it and dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
P.H. Jayani 36 WP215.2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 215 OF 2017
Arun Dashrat Bobade
…. Petitioner
v/s.
The State of Maharashtra and ors.
…. Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mrs. A.A. Takalkar, APP for the State.
CORAM: A.S. GADKARI AND
SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.
DATED : 13th FEBRUARY, 2024.
P. C. :-1) None present for the Petitioner. Record indicates that after 31stJuly, 2017, the Advocate for the Petitioner and/or the Petitioner has nottaken any steps even to circulate the Petition.2) It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing thePetition.
3) In view thereof, Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.(SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
PREETI HEERO JAYANI
Digitally signed by PREETI HEERO JAYANI Date: 2024.02.20 11:51:09 +0530
1/1
Arun Dashrat Bobade
The State of Maharashtra and ors.
A.S. Gadkari
Shyam C. Chandak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court