Writ petition by a municipal council regarding employment of the second respondent; the court was informed that employment had already been given, the statement was undisputed, and the petition was disposed of as the grievance did not survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:27982
1 903wp4974o24
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
903 WRIT PETITION NO. 4974 OF 2024
SHIRDI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER VERSUS
RAMKISAN MARIBA ADANGALE AND ANOTHER
Shri Hon Ashwin V., Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri Parag Barde, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.
DATE : 29th November, 2024
Per Court :-
The learned advocate for the petitioner makes a statement that the petitioner (Shirdi Municipal Council) had already given employment to respondent No.2 (Vikram Ramkisan Adangale). He places on record the order dated 02.08.2024 passed by the Chief Officer, Shirdi Municipal Council, which is marked as ‘X’ for identification.
by respondent No.2. Hence, the grievance in the petition does not survive. The Writ Petition is disposed of.
( PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.)
kps
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's grievance survived after the Municipal Council had already given employment to respondent No.2.
Shirdi Municipal Council through its Chief Officer
Ramkisan Mariba Adangale
Vikram Ramkisan Adangale
Prafulla S. Khubalkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
