Petitioner sought withdrawal of a writ petition as the main proceeding (Petition No. A-119/2021) had been finally decided, rendering the petition infructuous. The court disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:27983
1 901wp1037o24
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
901 WRIT PETITION NO. 1037 OF 2024
RAVI ABA DOLAS VERSUS
SADHANA RAVI DOLAS
... Shri Shrikrishna B. Solanke, Advocate i/by Shri Gaikwad Amol Ratan, Advocate for the Petitioner.
CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.
DATE : 29th November, 2024
Per Court :-
Shri Solanke, the learned advocate holding for the
learned advocate for the petitioner Shri Gaikwad, submits that the main proceeding bearing Petition No.A-119/2021 has been decided finally and, therefore, this Writ Petition has become infructuous. On instructions, he submits that he wants to withdraw the instant petition.
withdrawn.
( PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.)
kps
Ravi Aba Dolas
Sadhana Ravi Dolas
Prafulla S. Khubalkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
