Procedural order only: the Bench noted that a new advocate appeared for the petitioner and discharged the appearance of earlier counsel. The order decides nothing of general application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1) 21 wp 4946-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 4946 OF 2024
Shri Harishchandra S/o Harikishan Agrawal Vs.
The State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and others
CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE AND
SMT M.S. JAWALKAR, JJ. DATE : 23.08.2024.
Since Advocate Shri H.R. Gadhia appeared in the matter, the appearance of the earlier Counsels is discharged.
(SMT M.S. JAWALKAR, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)
Jayashree..
Signed by: Mrs. Jayashree Pethe Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 26/08/2024 11:35:52
Shri Harishchandra S/o Harikishan Agrawal
The State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai
AVINASH G. GHAROTE
M.S. JAWALKAR
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
