Petitioner was heard. Writ petition dismissed as infructuous because main proceedings before Family Court at Pune were disposed of. No specific relief detailed.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KVM
1/1
6 - WP 4681 OF 2016.doc
KANCHAN Digitally signed byKANCHAN VINOD VINOD MAYEKAR MAYEKAR Date: 2024.02.2115:01:57 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4681 OF 2016
Shri Dhananjay Vitthal Gawade
….. Petitioner
VERSUS
Mrs. Geetanjali Dhananjay Gawade
….. Respondent
Mr.Rahul S.Kulkarni for the Petitioner.
CORAM: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 15 FEBRUARY, 2024
P.C. :-
Mr.Kulkarni, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
submits that the main proceedings itself has been disposed of by
the Family Court at Pune. Therefore this writ petition has become
infructuous.
2. Writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]
Shri Dhananjay Vitthal Gawade
Mrs. Geetanjali Dhananjay Gawade
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court