The High Court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous because the original family court proceedings had already been disposed of by an order dated 18 August 2017. The writ petition was listed but the petitioner did not appear.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KVM
1/1
8 - WP 14238 OF 2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
KANCHAN Digitally signed byKANCHAN VINOD VINOD MAYEKAR MAYEKAR Date: 2024.02.2115:01:59 +0530
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 14238 OF 2017
Samir Surendrakumar Verma
VERSUS
….. Petitioner
….. Respondents
Poonam Samir Verma & Anr.
None for the Petitioner.
Ms.M.S.Bane, A.G.P. for the State.
CORAM: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 15 FEBRUARY, 2024
P.C. :-
None appears for the petitioner when the matter is called
out on 15 February, 2022 and on 8 February, 2024. Even today
when the matter is called out, none appears for the petitioner.
2. The Office informs the Court that as per the Maharashtra Legal Website, the original proceedings before the Family Court at Bandra has been disposed of by an order dated 18 August,
2017. Hence, writ petition has become infructuous.
3. Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]
Samir Surendrakumar Verma
Poonam Samir Verma & Anr.
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court