Sahebrao Narayan Lothe v. State of Maha., Thr. Principal Secretary, Co-Operative, Marketing and Textile Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Bombay HC9 Sept 2024WP/4628/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner relied on a co-ordinate bench judgment holding a precedent on revision maintainability per incuriam. The court issued notice to respondents, returnable after three weeks; AGP accepted notice for respondent Nos.1 to 4 and service directions were given for other respondents.

What the court decided

AI extract

Sahebrao Narayan Lothe vs State of Maha., Thr… — Cooperative Societies | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

1 16 wp 4628-2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.4628 OF 2024

¶4

(Sahebrao Narayan Lothe Vs. The State of Maharashtra, thr. its Principal Secretary, Co-operative, Marketing and Textile Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and others)

¶5

- - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶6

- - - - Shri Vipul Bhise, Advocate for Petitioner

¶7

Shri A.M. Ghogre, AGP for respondent Nos.1 to 4

¶8

CORAM : A NIL S. KILOR, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 09, 2024.

¶9

Learned Counsel for petitioner points out that the judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court dated 12/08/2024 in Writ Petition No.4900/2021 (Smt. Urmilabai wd/o Morati Kale and Ors. Vs. the Registrar General and Additional Commissioner and Special Registrar, Co-operative Society, Pune and Ors.), observing that the judgment on which the respondent No.2 has relied upon holding that the revision is not maintainable, is per incuriam. In that view of the matter, issue notice to the respondents, returnable after three weeks.

¶10

Shri A.M. Ghogre, learned AGP waives notice for respondent Nos.1 to 4.

¶11

The petitioner(s) are permitted to serve the respondent Nos.5 and 6 by private mode, in addition to regular mode of service, including service on the lawyer appearing before the trial Court and file affidavit of service by next date, failing which the petitioner(s) shall deposit

¶12

2 16 wp 4628-2024

¶13

costs of Rupees Five Hundred with High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Nagpur.

¶14

The office objections, if any, be removed before the returnable date.

¶15

JUDGE

¶16

R.S. Sahare

¶17

Signed by: Mrs. Ranjana Sahare Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 09/09/2024 17:35:18

Sahebrao Narayan Lothe v. State of Maha., Thr. Principal Secretary, Co-Operative, Marketing and Textile Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Sahebrao Narayan Lothe v. State of Maha., Thr. Principal Secretary, Co-Operative, Marketing and Textile Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shankuntala Wd/O Ramkuber Tripathi (Dead) Thr. Lrs. Ajay Ramkuber Tripathi and Others vs Abhishek Ramshchandra Gautam and Others

Sau. Sharda W/O Sagar Waghmare (Before Ku. Sharda D/O Gajanan Mathe) vs Sagar S/O Manmath Waghamre

Vishnu Vasanta Kamble vs the Assistant Registrar, (Animal Husbandary and Dairy, Fisheries) and Tahsil/Returning Off. and Ors.

Ashish Suresh Lonkar vs State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Cooperation, Marketing and Textile, Mumbai and Ors.

Yashwant S/O Dadaji Ambatkar vs Kalmana Market Urban Credit Co-Operative Society Limited, Nagpur Thr. Administrator and Others

Subhash Nattuji Thakare vs Vishnu Nattuji Thakare