The Bombay High Court stayed proceedings to give notice to Respondent No. 5 and awaited the reply affidavit from Respondent No. 3. Matter adjourned for instructions.
Stay of proceedings and direction to serve notice on Respondent No. 5.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 462 OF 2024
Sangeeta Bhimnath Surve
… Petitioner
V/s.
State of Maharashtra and Ors.
... Respondents
Mr. Shailesh More for the Petitioner Mr. Himanshu Takke, AGP for the Respondent Nos. 1,3 and 4
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATE : 21 FEBRUARY 2024
P.C. :-
The matter was heard in the morning session and kept in the afternoon for the learned AGP to take instructions. The learned AGP on instructions states that he will appear for the Respondent Nos. 1,3 and 4. We note this stand taken by the learned AGP on instructions as the impugned order issued by the Respondent No.3 states that the Petitioner is not a government servant. It is not explained as to if the Petitioner is not a government servant, what is the status of the Petitioner.
Digitally signed JYOTIPRAKASH by JYOTIPRAKASHPAWAR PAWAR Date: 2024.02.26 12:23:14 +0530
2
M.M. SATHAYE, J. NITIN JAMDAR, J.
Sangeeta Bhimnath Surve
State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
M.M. Sathaye
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
