Lawrence J.S. Fernandes and 9 Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and 7 Ors.

¶1

dtg 3-Wp-4577-2024.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 4577 OF 2024

¶5

Lawrence J.S. Fernandes & Ors. … Petitioners

¶6

V/s.

¶7

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents

¶8

Adv. Divyesh Jain i/by Adv. Nitin Gaware Patil for Petitioner. Adv. Vrushali Kabre, A.G.P. for Respondent-State. Adv. Yogesh Patil i/b Adv.Vijay Patil for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 – SRA.

¶9

CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ. DATE : 19^th December 2024.

¶10

P.C. :

¶11

The praecipe dated 18^th December, 2024 is circulated by the learned Advocate for Petitioners for ‘Speaking to the Minutes’ of Order dated 13^th December, 2024.

¶12

In line No.3 of para No.1 of the said Order, the words “MHADA Act” have been erroneously typed instead of “the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971”. The correct name of the Act is the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971.

¶13

1/2

¶14

dtg 3-Wp-4577-2024.doc

¶15

After incorporating the said correction, para No.1 of Order dated 13^th December, 2024 would read as under :-

¶16

“1) Learned Advocate appearing for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 -SRA, on instructions submitted that, hearing of the proceedings under Section 13(2) of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 are completed and the Competent Authority has now closed the said file for passing Orders. He submitted that, the Competent Authority may pass the Orders in the said proceedings within a period of four weeks from today.”

¶17

1. Order dated 13^th December, 2024 be corrected accordingly and a corrected copy of Order be uploaded on the official website of High Court, Bombay.

¶18

1. Praecipe dated 18^th December, 2024, is disposed off.

¶19

( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )

¶20

2/2

Lawrence J.S. Fernandes and 9 Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and 7 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Lawrence J.S. Fernandes and 9 Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and 7 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Lawrence J.S. Fernandes and 9 Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and 7 Ors.

Atul Ramanlal Vora vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Manoj C. Bokadia Proprietor of Neeta Jewellers vs Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai and 9 Ors.

Rajesh Narayan Vartak and 2 Ors. vs the Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai and Anr.

Mahendra Nathuram Salunkhe vs Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai and 2 Ors.

Lawrence J.S. Fernandes and 9 Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and 7 Ors.