Group of four writ petitions by Municipal Council Hinganghat adjourned; respondent's counsel sought time to take instructions.
Procedural adjournment order only; the court directed that these petitions be listed along with Writ Petition No. 4548 of 2024 and stand over to 16th October 2024. No legal proposition decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20-wp-4545-24.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
Writ Petition (WP) No. 4545 of 2024 Municipal Council Hinganghat, through its Chief Officer
Versus
Shrichand S/o Asardas Dardai and another
With
Writ Petition (WP) No. 4547 of 2024 Municipal Council Hinganghat, through its Chief Officer
Versus
Sunil S/o Namdeo Mudafale
With
Writ Petition (WP) No. 4546 of 2024 Municipal Council Hinganghat, through its Chief Officer
Versus
Pundlik S/o Dadaji Sathe
With
Writ Petition (WP) No. 4549 of 2024 Municipal Council Hinganghat, through its Chief Officer
Versus
Pravin S/o Babarao Jagtap
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order
Shri M.I.Dhatrak, Advocate for the petitioner in all petitions.
CORAM : N.R.BORKAR, J. DATED : 26th SEPTEMBER, 2024.
Writ Petition No. 4545 of 2024
Mrs. Giratkar, learned counsel submits that
she has instructions to appear on behalf of the respondent no.1 and seeks time to take instructions.
SKNair
20-wp-4545-24.odt
2
[N.R.BORKAR, J.]
Signed by: Mr. S.K. NAIR SKNair Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 27/09/2024 18:18:40
Municipal Council Hinganghat, through its Chief Officer
Shrichand S/o Asardas Dardai and another
Sunil S/o Namdeo Mudafale
Pundlik S/o Dadaji Sathe
Pravin S/o Babarao Jagtap
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
