Adjournment order in a writ petition; petitioners undertook to appear before respondent no.2 to present a settlement proposal. Matter stood over to the next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 28wp4544.2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.4544/2024
Suryakant s/o Sambhaji Khade and another Vs. State of Maharashtra and others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders.
Mr. A.D.Dangore, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. Hrishikesh Marathe, AGP for respondent no.1. Mr. Onkar Deshpande, Advocate for respondent nos.2 and 3. Mr. P.D.Chikte, Advocate for respondent no.4.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE & ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 5, 2024.
In response to the submissions made by Mr.Onkar Deshpande, Counsel for respondent nos.2 and 3, the petitioners undertake to appear before the said respondent no.2 on 7th August, 2024 at 11.00 a.m., so as to make proposal for settlement given by the petitioners.
Stand over to 12th August, 2024.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
Mukund Ambulkar
Signed by: Ambulkar (MLA) Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 05/08/2024 18:05:01
Suryakant s/o Sambhaji Khade and another
State of Maharashtra
respondent nos.2 and 3
respondent no.4
NITIN W. SAMBRE
ABHAY J. MANTRI
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
