Harmeet Kaur Paramjit Singh Godi v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCWP/4535/2024
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
Talwalkar .. 1 .. common order 2
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶3
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.
¶4
DATE :- 2nd DECEMBER, 2024
¶5
Per Court :-
¶6
- At the time of rising at 6.00 pm, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.
¶7
- In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.
¶8
- Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.
¶9
- The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed
¶10
before the next date.
¶11
- Subject to the above, list these matters as under:-
Coram
AI extract
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
ASHWIN D. BHOBE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Chetan Gopal Shirudkar vs the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation and 6 Ors.
Purushottam H. Pachurkar vs the Chief Executive Officer and Ors.
Manohar B. Gori vs the Chief Executive Officer of M.I.D.C.
Yogesh Madhusudan Talashilkar and 2 Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra through Government Pleader and 2 Ors.