Quashed

Kartik Naresh Shriwas v. the Chairman, District Level Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati

Bombay HC3 Aug 2024WP/4507/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Cousin brothers' OBC (Nhavi) caste claims were rejected solely on the ground that their forefather was not resident of Maharashtra before the 13.10.1967 cut-off date, ignoring their grandfather's service book showing residence since 1955. The High Court quashed both scrutiny committee orders and remitted for fresh consideration within three months.

What the court decided

AI extract

Kartik Naresh Shriwas Vs the Chairman, District Level Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati — Bombay HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2024:BHC-NAG:8531-DB

¶2

J WP-4442-2023.odt

¶3

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 4442 OF 2023

¶6

PETITIONER : Harsh Rajkumar Shriwas, a/a 19 yrs, Occu – student, R/o 17, Gurukrupa Coloney, Near Dental College, Amravati. .. VERSUS .. RESPONDENT : The Chairman, District Level Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati.

¶7

WITH

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO.4507 OF 2023

¶9

PETITIONER Kartik Naresh Shriwas, a/a 20 yrs, Occu – student, R/o 17, Gurukrupa Coloney, Near Dental College, Amravati. ..VERSUS..

¶10

RESPONDENT The Chairman, District Level Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati.

¶11

Mr R. R. Rathod, Advocate for Petitioners.

¶12

Mr A. M. Ghogare, AGP for Respondent/State.

¶13

CORAM : VINAY JOSHI AND M. W. CHANDWANI, JJ. DATE : 3 rd AUGUST, 2024.

¶14

ORAL JUDGMENT : (PER : VINAY JOSHI, J.)

¶15

. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally

¶16

with consent of learned counsels appearing for the parties.

¶17

J WP-4442-2023.odt

¶18

¶19

Petitioners in both petitions are real cousin brother, whose caste claim for the caste of “Nhavi” coming under Other Backward Class has been rejected by the respondent – Scrutiny Committee. It reveals from the impugned orders dated 12.07.2022 that only on the basis that the petitioners’ forefather was not resident of Maharashtra State prior to cut-off date i.e. 13.10.1967, the caste claim was declined. It reveals from the impugned orders itself that petitioners’ claimed before the Committee that their grandfather was resident of State of Maharashtra from the year 1955, as he joined police services in the Maharashtra. The petitioners have tendered a copy of service book of their grandfather to substantiate said contention.

¶20

The impugned orders though bare a reference to that extent, however, Committee has not considered the vital document i.e. copy of service book of petitioners’ grandfather. It is not clear whether said document was tendered before the Committee, which was crucial to decide the issue. Since the caste claim was rejected solely on the said ground, we deem it appropriate that Committee shall reconsider the entire material

¶21

J WP-4442-2023.odt

¶22

¶23

including service book of petitioners’ grandfather and to take a fresh decision in accordance with law.

¶24

In view of above, both impugned orders dated 12.07.2022 are hereby quashed and set aside. The matter is remitted back to the Committee for fresh consideration. Both petitioners are permitted to tender a copy of service book of their grandfather as well as other document, if any, in support of their case. The Committee shall decide the petitioners’ caste claim a fresh within three months from the date of a communication of this order.

¶25

Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. No order

¶26

as to costs.

¶27

We direct the Committee to act accordingly.

¶28

(M. W. CHANDWANI, J.) (VINAY JOSHI, J.)

¶29

TAMBE

Kartik Naresh Shriwas v. the Chairman, District Level Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Kartik Naresh Shriwas v. the Chairman, District Level Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhananjay S/O Hemraj Bhurle Vs the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Bhandara and Others

Ku. Rupali Laxman Sonkusare (Mrs. Rupali W/O Sudhirkumar Neel) Vs Union of India, through Secretary, Department of Posts, Ministry of Communication, New Delhi and or

Jagruti Shetkari Bahuuddeshiya Mitra Mandal, Kavtha(Naik), Thr. Treasurer Nilkanth Aaudumbar Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Chief Secretary, Social Justice and Special Asst. Dept. Mumbai

Harsh Rajkumar Shriwas Vs the Chairman, District Level Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati

Premlata D/O Manoharrao Sonparote Vs Dr Arvind R. Ladole, through Principal, B.B. Arts, N.B. Commerce and B.P. Science College, Digras

Manisha Kallu Nishad Vs Union of India, Thr. Ministry of Coal, New Delhi and Others