Writ petition withdrawn after counsel stated its purpose had been accomplished; disposed of as withdrawn with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
0208wp4009.23
1
Order
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 4009/2023.
Jagruti Shetkari Bahuuddeshiya Mitra Mandal, Kavtha (Naik)
- VERSUS-
State of Maharashtra and others.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders
or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Shri S.N. Chikhale, Advocate h/f. Shri P.S. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner.
CORAM : VINAY JOSHI AND M.W. CHANDWANI, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 02, 2024.
Mentioned out of turn.
withdrawn. No costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
Rgd.
Jagruti Shetkari Bahuuddeshiya Mitra Mandal, Kavtha (Naik)
State of Maharashtra
Vinay Joshi
M.W. Chandwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
