Hashim Bashir Kalolikal v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner convicted by Metropolitan Magistrate in three cheque dishonour cases arising from one transaction challenged default sentences for non-payment of compensation. Court found the case covered by the Supreme Court's single transaction rule and issued notice to complainants, permitting their impleadment.
What the court decided
1/2 14-Wp-4474-2024.doc
CHAITANYAASHOKJADHAV Digitallysigned byCHAITANYAASHOKJADHAVDate:2024.12.1911:21:56+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4474 OF 2024
Hashim Bashir Kalolikal .. Petitioner
Versus
State Of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr. Manish Mirpuri, for the Petitioner.
Mr. J. P. Yagnik, A.P.P. for the State/Respondent.
CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED : 13th DECEMBER, 2024
P.C:-
- While raising a challenge to the penalty imposed on being convicted by the Metropolitan Magistrate in three distinct cases, arising out of the same transaction, and being aggrieved by the default sentences to be undergone for failure to pay the compensation in each of the cases, the counsel for the Petitioner would rely upon the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in case of V. K. Bansal V/s. State of Haryana And Anr .1
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether default sentences for non-payment of compensation in three cases arising from the same transaction can run concurrently per the single transaction rule.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Hashim Bashir Kalolikal
- respondent
State Of Maharashtra
Coram
Bharati Dangre
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
15 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court