The petitioner, already transferred and relieved, sought quashing of the order. The court noted the representation regarding transfer was being considered by the Zilla Parishad according to a Government Resolution. The writ petition was disposed of in light of these submissions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:9283-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 4427 OF 2024
SANDIPAN BHAGVAT DATAL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHER
Mr. R. D. Biradar, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. V. M. Kagne, AGP for the Respondent/State Mr. V. C. Patil, Advocate h/f Mr. U. B. Bondar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND R. M. JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : 29th April, 2024
PER COURT :-
1 of 2
14.wp4427.24.odt
( R. M. JOSHI, J. )
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )
ssp
2 of 2
14.wp4427.24.odt
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the transfer order of the petitioner is liable to be quashed?
SANDIPAN BHAGVAT DATAL
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
Respondent Nos. 3 and 4
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
R. M. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
