Shital Namdev Tigile v. the State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:699-DB
909-WP-435-2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 435 OF 2024
SHITAL NAMDEV TIGILE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND
ANOTHER
Mr. Sandip C. Swami, Advocate for Petitioner
Mr. S. B. Narwade, AGP for Respondent – State
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND
Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.
DATE:11.01.2024
PER COURT :-
1. Considering Section 3(q) and Section 15(1)(b) of the
Administrative Tribunals Act, the learned Advocate for thePetitioner submits that the Petitioner would withdraw this Petition
and file a fresh Original Application before the learned Tribunal.
2.In view of the above, with liberty, this Petition is
disposed off.
[ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ] [ RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ]
SMS
1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SHITAL NAMDEV TIGILE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY
ANOTHER
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
Y. G. KHOBRAGADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court