This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
929-WP-349-2024.odt
2024:BHC-AUG:704-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 349 OF 2024
TUKARAM DATTOBA SURYAWANSHI VERSUS
THE AUSA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHIEF
OFFICER
Mr. D. P. Palodkar, Advocate h/f Mr. Shaikh Tarek Mobin H.,
Advocate for Petitioner
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.
DATE:11.01.2024
PER COURT :-
1. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that
the Petitioner would tender an application to the Respondent
seeking his indulgence for regularisation of the encroachment that
has been committed by the Petitioner.
2.We would loathe to entertain a Petition wherein a
direction to regularise encroachment is sought under a Writ of
Mandamus.
3. This Petition is disposed off .
1 of 2
(( 2 ))
929-WP-349-2024
4.If the Petitioner moves an application/representation to
the Respondent or any Government Authority, it is for the said
authority to deal with in as per the Rules and the policies applicable.
We express no view on the contents of such an application/
representation.
[ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ] [ RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ]
SMS
2 of 2
Tukaram Dattoba Suryawanshi
The Ausa Municipal Council Through Its Chief Officer
Ravindra V. Ghuge
Y. G. Khobragade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court