In a writ petition, the petitioner and respondent settled the dispute amicably. Consent terms signed by both parties were tendered, admitted, and tendered on record.
Writ petition disposed of in terms of consent terms signed by the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
Neeta Sawant
6-WP-4349-2023.docx
13 February 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
W RIT PETITION NO. 4349 OF 2023
Sunil Vilas Rainak … .Petitioner
V/s.
SPM Autocomp Systems Pvt.
Ltd. thr. Its Managing Director
… .Respondent
Mr.Piyush Pande, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Aumkar Joshi,for the Respondent.
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
Dated : 13 February 2024.
P.C. :
The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Respondent jointly submit that the parties have amicably settled the dispute. Consent Terms are tendered, which are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. The Consent Terms are signed by the Petitioner and Respondent as well as their respective advocates. The signatories to the Consent Terms are present before the Court who admit their signatures as well as contents of the Consent Terms.The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms.SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
Digitally signed by NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Date: 2024.02.14 10:33:07 +0530
NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT
Sunil Vilas Rainak
SPM Autocomp Systems Pvt. Ltd.
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court