Appellant sought leave to withdraw the second appeal. The court granted leave and disposed of the appeal as withdrawn. Consequently, the pending civil application was also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
34-SA-453-2019.docx
13 February 2024
Neeta Sawant
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO. 453 OF 2019 ALONGW ITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 713 OF 2019
Mr. Vana Mansing Pagare, since
Deceased through his legal heirs… .Appellants
V/s.
Mr. Popatrao Chindha Patil & Ors. … .Respondents
Ms. Pooja Malik i/by. Mr. N.R. Bubna,for the Appellants.
Mr. Sagar Joshi i/by. Mr. B.D. Joshi, for the Respondents.
Mr. Shantaram Vanji Patil, legal heir of Appellant present in
Court.
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. Dated : 13 February 2024.
P.C. :
The learned counsel for the Appellant, on instructions from Appellant No.1A, is personally present before the Court, seeks leave to withdraw the Appeal. Leave granted. Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.With disposal of the Appeal, Civil Application does not survive. The same is accordingly disposed of.Digitally signed by NEETA NEETA SHAILESH SHAILESH SAWANT SAWANT Date: 2024.02.14 16:52:37 +0530
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
Mr. Vana Mansing Pagare
Mr. Popatrao Chindha Patil
Ors.
SANDEEP V. MARNE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court