Writ petition adjourned for paucity of time; interim orders, if any, continued till the next date.
A bare adjournment order: the matter was stood over to a fixed date due to paucity of time and any interim order was directed to continue until then. It decides nothing of general application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-0
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4322 OF 2024
Damu Deoram Bhosale Alias Damodar Deoram....PETITIONER Bhosale
V/S
The Maharashtra State Road Development ....RESPONDENT Corporation And Ors.
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE B.P. COLABAWALLA &
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, JJ DATE : 16th October, 2024
P.C. :
Due to paucity of time, stand over to 12/12/2024. Interim order, if any, to continue till then.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Page 1/1
Damu Deoram Bhosale Alias Damodar Deoram
The Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation And Ors.
B.P. Colabawalla
Somasekhar Sundaresan
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
