Writ petition disposed of as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel submitted that a subsequent development rendered the petition infructuous. No substantive adjudication occurred.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp4320.22.O.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.4320 OF 2022
(Ujjwala Ritesh Gandhare Vs. Swati Rajendra Ramlal)
Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar’s Orders.
Court's or Judge's orders.
Mr. Viren V. Joshi, Advocate on behalf of Mr. R. R. Deo, Advocate for Petitioner.
CORAM: N. R. BORKAR, J. DATE: 5 th DECEMBER, 2024.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent development, the present petition has become infructuous.
(N. R. BORKAR, J.)
NSN
Ujjwala Ritesh Gandhare
Swati Rajendra Ramlal
N. R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
