Ritesh Vasantrao Gandhare v. Rajendra Ramlal Jaiswal
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous after counsel stated that subsequent developments rendered it so; no substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp4319.22.O.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.4319 OF 2022
(Ritesh Vasantrao Gandhare Vs. Rajendra Ramlal Jaiswal)
Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar’s Orders.
Court's or Judge's orders.
Mr. Viren V. Joshi, Advocate on behalf of Mr. R. R. Deo, Advocate for Petitioner.
CORAM: N. R. BORKAR, J. DATE: 5 th DECEMBER, 2024.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent development, the present petition has become infructuous.
(N. R. BORKAR, J.)
NSN
Ritesh Vasantrao Gandhare
Rajendra Ramlal Jaiswal
N. R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court