Rajendra Prabhakar Chaudhary v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Batch adjournment order dated 21.11.2024 by S. G. Mehare and Shailesh P. Brahme, JJ., High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, in Writ Petition No. 14590 of 2019 (Machhindra Mahadeo Wanve v. State of Maharashtra; counsel for petitioners: Sayyed Tausif Yasin; State represented by A.G.P./Addl.G.P. V. M. Kagane and others). Over one hundred writ petitions (2007–2024) and four F.C.A. matters adjourned for paucity of time to 22.01.2025–28.01.2025; several marked 'In urgent category'; interim relief/undertaking/statement to continue till next date. Useful for tracking pendency/scheduling status only — no merits, statutes, precedents or quantum addressed.
What did the court decide?
Matters adjourned due to paucity of time; existing interim relief/undertaking/statement, if any, ordered to continue till the next date. ¶¶9