Writ petition dismissed as infructuous after counsel stated the petition had rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp4272.24
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 4272 OF 2024
( Tejpal Tejrao More and others ..vs.. State of Maharashtra, through its Principal Secretary, Mumbai and another )
Mr. A.D. Ramteke, Counsel for the petitioners, Mr. J.Y. Ghurde, AGP for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE &
ABHAY J. MANTRI, J J . DATED : 29-08-2024
The learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the petition has rendered infruuctuous.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
adgokar
Tejpal Tejrao More and others
State of Maharashtra, through its Principal Secretary, Mumbai
NITIN W. SAMBRE
ABHAY J. MANTRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
