A writ petition was heard. Counsel for the petitioner submitted the subject matter had rendered the petition infructuous. Accordingly, the petition was dismissed. No substantive decision on land acquisition is recorded.
Petition dismissed as rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp1199.24
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 1199 OF 2024
( Vitthal s/o Harishchandra Paraskar ..vs.. The Deputy Collector/Land Acquisition Officer (Medium Project) Buldhana and another )
Mr. N.B. Kalwaghe, Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. H. Marathe, AGP for respondent No.1, Mr. H.R. Gadhia, Counsel for respondent No.2.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE &
ABHAY J. MANTRI, J J . DATED : 29-08-2024
Mentioned. Taken on Board.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
adgokar
Vitthal s/o Harishchandra Paraskar
The Deputy Collector/Land Acquisition Officer (Medium Project) Buldhana
Another
Nitin W. Sambre
Abhay J. Mantri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
