Writ petition seeking quashing of two FIRs was held multifarious and not maintainable under Article 226; the petitioner was permitted to withdraw it with liberty to file separate petitions against each FIR, and the petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
Liberty to withdraw the petition and file two separate petitions for quashing each FIR.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Gitalaxmi 22-wp-425-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 425 OF 2024
Sunit Arvind Waghmare …..Petitioner Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …..Respondents
Mr. Ashutosh Gaikwad i/b Apex Law House for the Petitioner. Mr. S. A. Karmakar, A.P.P. for the Respondent-State. Mr. Santosh Tiwari for Respondent No. 4. P.S.I. M. B. Dhumal, Bhoiwada Police Station, Mumbai and P.S.I. S. S. Pawar, Matunga Police Station, Mumbai present.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : 5th AUGUST 2024.
P.C.:-
and is not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.)
(A. S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Digitally signed by GITALAXMI GITALAXMI KRISHNA KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR KOTAWADEKAR Date: 2024.08.13 10:30:58 +0530
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sunit Arvind Waghmare
The State of Maharashtra
A. S. Gadkari
Dr. Neela Gokhale
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
