Writ petition disposed as infructuous after counsel stated the challenge had rendered infructuous; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:6851-DB
9-WP-424-2018.odt 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO.424 of 2018
Sunil Harishchandra Manjare
vs
The State of Maharashtra and others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order
Ms Aparna Telang, Advocate h/f Mr. A. P. Tathod, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. S. M. Ghodeswar, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent nos.1 & 3.
CORAM :- NITIN W. SAMBRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE :- 2nd JULY, 2024
Counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the challenge raised in the petition has rendered infructuous.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
Andurkar.
Sunil Harishchandra Manjare
The State of Maharashtra
NITIN W. SAMBRE
ABHAY J. MANTRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
