Dismissed

Javed Ahmed S/O Hafiz Bashir Ahmed v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr.Its Secretary, Department of School Education and Sports, Mumbai and

Bombay HC2 Jul 2024CAW/905/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Legal heirs of a deceased petitioner sought pay protection for earlier service as Teacher after he resigned and joined as Headmaster by direct recruitment. The court held that resignation extinguished the right to pay protection absent express grant at appointment, and dismissed the writ petition.

What the court decided

AI extract

Javed Ahmed S/O Hafiz Bashir Ahmed Vs the… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-NAG:6914-DB

¶2

8-WP-420-2018.odt 1

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION (W) No. 906 of 2021 in WRIT PETITION NO.420 of 2018

¶5

Javed Ahmed s/o Hafiz Bashir Ahmed Vs

¶6

The State of Maharashtra and others.

¶7

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order

¶8

Mr. B.G.Kulkarni, Advocate for applicant/petitioner. Mr. S. M. Ghodeswar, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent nos.1 to 4 and 6.

¶9

CORAM :- NITIN W. SAMBRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE :- 2^nd JULY, 2024

¶10

This is an application for condonation of delay in bringing legal heirs of deceased petitioner on record.

¶11

For the reasons disclosed in the application and the application is not objected, the delay stands condoned. The application stands disposed of.

¶12

CIVIL APPLICATION (W) NO. 905 OF 2021 in WRIT PETITION NO.420 of 2018

¶13

This is an application for permission to bring on record legal heirs of deceased petitioner.

¶14

For the reasons disclosed in the application, permission is granted to bring on record the legal heirs of deceased petitioner. Necessary amendment be carried out forthwith.

¶15

The application stands disposed of.

¶16

WRIT PETITION NO.420 of 2018

¶17

Heard Mr. Kulkarni, learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶18

It is not in dispute that after the superannuation of the petitioner, he has expired. His legal heirs are pursuing the claim qua entitlement for pay protection.

¶19

In this background the claim of the petitioner appears to be the earlier posting held by the deceased petitioner was on the post of

¶20

8-WP-420-2018.odt 2

¶21

Teacher in a Junior College. The deceased petitioner resigned from the said post and joined on the post of ‘Head Master’ by competing in the process of direct recruitment.

¶22

Mr. Kulkarni, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would urge that in view of the service conditions, the provisions of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pay) Rules are attracted and as such, the petitioner is entitled for pay protection.

¶23

The fact remains that once the petitioner resigned from the earlier post and opted for a fresh appointment on the post of Headmaster, the petitioner ceases to have any right to claim pay protection unless expressly such benefits are claimed and granted at the time of appointment.

¶24

Though Mr. Kulkarni has claimed that the petitioner was granted pay protection for certain period viz. for three years, however the same stood withdrawn, it is always open for the respondents to correct their mistake in case of grant of higher pay to which the deceased petitioner was entitled.

¶25

The petitioner, in our opinion, has not reserved such right or has not contested the same at the very threshold while he was appointed as Headmaster, it cannot be said that the petitioner can claim pay protection.

¶26

Apart from above, the fact remains that it was voluntary act of the petitioner to resign from the earlier service and opt for fresh appointment on the post of Headmaster.

¶27

As such, by virtue of his own creation and conduct, the petitioner got himself appointed on the post of Head Master in the School. That being so, it cannot be said that the petitioner has a right to claim pay protection of the earlier employment where he has resigned.

¶28

8-WP-420-2018.odt 3

¶29

For the reasons aforesaid, no case for causing interference in extra ordinary jurisdiction is made out. The writ petition fails and it is dismissed as such.

¶30

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)

¶31

Andurkar.

Javed Ahmed S/O Hafiz Bashir Ahmed v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr.Its Secretary, Department of School Education and Sports, Mumbai and

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Javed Ahmed S/O Hafiz Bashir Ahmed v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr.Its Secretary, Department of School Education and Sports, Mumbai and

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Madhukarrao Thakre Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Rural Development Dept., Mumbai and Others

Prakash S/O Shamrao Kharwade and Another Vs State of Maha. Thr. Chief Sec. General Administration Dept. Mantralaya, Mumbai and Others

Paradise Infrastructures, Thr. Partners/ Authorized Signatory, Harshad S/O. Lalitrao Mote Vs Nirmal Ujwal Credit, Co-Operative Society Ltd., Nagpur Thr. Recovery Officer

Javed Ahmed S/O Hafiz Bashir Ahmed Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr.Its Secretary, Department of School Education and Sports, Mumbai and

Vishwanath S/O Ramkrishna Darbe Vs Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, through Its Member Secretary, Nagpur and 1

Sunil S/O Harishchandra Manjare Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Education Department, Mumbai and 2 Others