Three writ petitions against the State of Maharashtra were withdrawn by counsel mid-argument with liberty to file a PIL petition instead; the court dismissed the petitions as withdrawn.
Withdrawal permitted with liberty to file a PIL petition; writ petitions dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
405.4208.24-wp+.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4208 OF 2024
BASAVRAJ GURAPPA PATIL
Digitally signed by BASAVRAJ GURAPPA PATIL Date: 2024.03.27 18:59:33 +0530
Bandu Ambadas Kamble
….. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ….. Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.4209 OF 2024
Pratap Dhanaji Pawar
….. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
….. Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.4210 OF 2024
Deepak Dattatray Aaree Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
….. Petitioner
….. Respondents
Shri Vijay Garad for the Petitioners
Mr. P. P. Kakade, Government Pleader with Mr. O. A. Chandurkar, Addl.GP and Ms. A. A. Nadkarni, AGP for Respondent No.1 – State
CORAM: DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
DATE : MARCH 27, 2024
P.C.
1. After arguing for some time, learned Counsel representing
the Petitioners states that he may be permitted to withdraw the Writ Petitions with liberty to file a PIL Petition.
Page | 1
Basavraj
405.4208.24-wp+.docx
liberty as prayed for.
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
Page | 2
Basavraj
Bandu Ambadas Kamble
Pratap Dhanaji Pawar
Deepak Dattatray Aaree
The State of Maharashtra
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
