Bajaj Finance Limited v. Sunita Ashokkumar Gandhi
Case brief
What is this about?
Arbitration application adjourned after counsel noted the cause of action arises in Mumbai, requiring filing on the Original Side; applicant undertook amendment.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 34-ARBAP 21-24.doc
Digitally signed by MUGDHA MUGDHA MANOJ MANOJ PARANJAPE PARANJAPE Date: 2024.10.05 13:35:09 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.21 OF 2024
Bajaj Finance Ltd. … Applicant V/s. Sunita Ashokkumar Gandhi … Respondent
Mr. Manoj Prajapati a/w Vikas Mishra i/by Mohit Gadkari & Company for the Applicant.
Mr. Mayank Bagla, Counsel i/by Bagla & Associates for the Respondent.
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 3RD OCTOBER 2024
P.C. :
- Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent submits
that the cause of action in the present Arbitration Application has arisen out of the City of Mumbai and thus the Arbitration Application will have to be filed on the Original Side.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Bajaj Finance Ltd.
- respondent
Sunita Ashokkumar Gandhi
Coram
Arif S. Doctor
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Bajaj Finance Limited vs Sunita Ashokkumar Gandhi
Sushama Sengstschmid Daughter of Digambar Ramchandra Tanksale vs Digambar Ramchandra Tanksale Alias Tanksale Digambar Ramchandra
Gunvanti Ramesh Shah vs Nine Globe Builders
Tilak Nagar Sri Gurudatta Cooperative Housing Society Limited vs Mishal Construction Private Limited