Surendran Manikan Payamal v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition challenging a recovery certificate under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act for alleged lack of proper notice. Court issued notice to examine compliance with Rule 86A and restrained disturbance of petitioners' possession until the returnable date.
What did the court decide?
Possession of petitioners' property not to be disturbed till returnable date (17 April 2024); record and additional affidavit sought from respondents.
What the court decided
04-WP.4163.2024.doc
TAUSEEF LAIQUEE FAROOQUI
Digitally signed by TAUSEEF LAIQUEE FAROOQUI Date: 2024.04.05 10:02:42 +0530
Tauseef
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4163 OF 2024
Surendran Manikan Payamal & Anr. ...Petitioners Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Manoj Jaiswal for the Petitioners.
Mr. Shivaji Lanke a/w. Ms. Priyanka Lanke for Respondent Nos.3 and 4.
CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR, JITENDRA JAIN, J.J.
DATE : 3rd APRIL 2024.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether service of notice on the petitioners in proceedings under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act was in accordance with Rule 86A of the Rules.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Surendran Manikan Payamal
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
A. S. Chandurkar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Yadav Nagar Sra Chs through Its Chief Promoter Madhukar Jyoti Belekar vs the Assistant Municipal Commissioner G/South Ward and 2 Ors.
Kamal Sevakram Jadhawani vs State of Maharashtra
James Scaria Kochuputhenparampil vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Star Electric vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai