Petition challenging an externment order dated 08.12.2023; the six-month externment period had expired, so the court disposed of the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 8.wp.416.24
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 416/2024 Gajanan s/o. Kashinath Kamble
Vs.
State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. S. V. Sirpurkar, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. A. A. Madiwale, A.P.P. for Respondents/State.
CORAM : VINAY JOSHI AND MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 12/08/2024.
. Heard.
(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (VINAY JOSHI, J.)
RGurnule
Signed by: Mrs. R.M. MANDADE Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 13/08/2024 18:45:04
Gajanan s/o. Kashinath Kamble
State of Maharashtra
VINAY JOSHI
VRUSHALI V. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
