Rajendra Balkrishna Kanvinde v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Procedural order in a writ petition: the APP waived notice for the State, and the court directed the Investigating Officer to verify counsel's statement that Respondent No.2 had expired, listing the matter for 2nd December 2024.
What the court decided
5-WP-4158-2024.DOC
Shivgan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4158 OF 2024
Rajendra Balkrishna Kanvinde …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents
Ms. Lakshmi Raman , for the Petitioner. Smt. Mahalakshmi Ganapathy, APP , for Respondent No.1State.
CORAM Dr. Neela Gokhale, J. DATED: 19th November 2024
PC:-
- Smt. Mahalakshmi Ganapathy, learned APP representing the State, waives notice for the Respondent No.1State. Ms. Lakshmi Raman learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner says that she has learnt that the Respondent No.2 has expired. The concerned Investigating Officer is directed to verify the statement made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner.
- List on 2nd December 2024.
Digitally signed by SHAMBHAVI SHAMBHAVI NILESH NILESH SHIVGAN SHIVGAN Date: 2024.11.21 10:36:05 +0530
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rajendra Balkrishna Kanvinde
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
- respondent
Respondent No.2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court