Writ petition of 1997 dismissed for non-prosecution after counsel reported no instructions from petitioners, with petitioner nos. 2 and 3 deceased and their heirs unserved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3-WP-4102.97.docx
Gayatri
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4102 OF 1997
Sonabai Jinnappa Takle and Ors. … Petitioners
Vs.
Nilavva Chanbasayya Devarunath (Deceased) Her LH and Lrs.
1.1. Gangadhar C. Devarumath and Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. A. H. Palekar, Advocate for Petitioners.
Mr. A. L. Patki, Advocate for Respondents.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATE : 9th FEBRUARY 2024
P.C.
him to petitioner nos. 2 and 3 is returned with postal remark “dead”. He submits that so far as petitioner no. 1 is concerned, though she is
served with his letter as per the postal remark, he has no further instructions from her. He submits that he also does not have any instructions from the heirs and legal representatives of deceased petitioner nos. 2 and 3.
1/2
3-WP-4102.97.docx
record his praecipe along with the postal remarks.
Digitally signed GAYATRI by GAYATRI RAJENDRA RAJENDRASHIMPI SHIMPI Date: 2024.02.12 14:02:18 +0530
[GAURI GODSE, J.]
2/2
Sonabai Jinnappa Takle
Gangadhar C. Devarumath
Gauri Godse
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
