Disposed

Gautam Manohar Landge and Others v. the State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Rural Development Dept., Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC16 Oct 2024WP/4055/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Zilla Parishad Gadchiroli employees sought tribal incentive allowance and additional house rent allowance per the 6th and 7th Pay Commission under Government Resolution dated 06.08.2002. Following earlier Nagpur Bench decisions granting identical relief to Gondia and Yavatmal employees, the court directed release of payments within three months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to CEO, Zilla Parishad Gadchiroli to revise and pay tribal incentive allowance and additional HRA arrears per 6th/7th Pay Commission within three months; respondent No.2 to ensure compliance

Gautam Manohar Landge and Others vs the State… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-NAG:12195-DB

¶2

958- wp -4055-24.odt

¶3

1/5

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.4787 OF 2024

¶6

Raghunath Masaji Bhandekar and others Petitioners -Versus-

¶7

The State Of Maharashtra and others. Respondents

¶8

WITH

¶9

WRIT PETITION NO.4055 OF 2024

¶10

Gautam Manohar Landge and others Petitioners -Versus- The State Of Maharashtra and others. Respondents

¶11

Mr.P.S. Kshirsagar, Adv. for the petitioners Mr.J.Y.Ghurde, AGP for respondent-State Mr.S.R.Agrawal, counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3.

¶12

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, AND MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. DATED: 16/10/2024

¶13

ORDER (Per : Vrushali V.Joshi, J.)

¶14

Rule . Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

¶15

In both the writ petitions, the petitioners are seeking the same relief, hence a common order is passed.

¶16

The petitioners are praying for a direction to respondent Zilla

¶17

Parishad, Gadchiroli, to grant the benefit of tribal/Naxlite incentive allowance as per the 6^th Pay and 7^th Pay Commission and pay the arrears

Kavita

958- wp -4055-24.odt

2/5

accordingly and also praying for direction to grant of additional house rent allowances. The petitioners are working with the Zilla Parisahd, Gadchiroli in the tribal area.

¶22

As per provisions of the Government Resolution dated 06.08.2002, the employees working in the tribal area are entitled for the tribal incentive allowance, which is 15% of the salary, whereunder minimum allowance of Rs.200/- and maximum allowance of Rs.1500/per month is payable.

¶23

The reliance is placed on the communication of the State Government addressed to the Chief Executive Officer, Gondia clarifying that the provisions contained in the Government Resolution dated 06.08.2002 shall also be made applicable to all the employees working in the Rural Development Department, which includes the teachers and other employees.

¶24

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has placed before us the judgment of this Court in Writ Petition No.5063 of 2024 (Vijay Baburao Bansod and ors Vs. State of Maharashtra and others) dated 01.10.2024 , wherein this Court has relied on the judgment of Narayan Ratanlal Thakre and ors .Vs. State of Maharashtra (Writ Petition No.6114 of 2023), decided on 22^nd February, 2024 pertaining

Kavita

958- wp -4055-24.odt

3/5

to the Zilla Parishad Gondia. A similar relief was claimed by the employees within the purview of Zilla Parishad, Gondia, where they made a grievance that in pursuance of the Government Resolution dated 06.08.2002, they preferred representations to the respondents at regular intervals, but they were kept away from the benefits flowing from the said Government Resolution. It was argued that the State Government has made it evidently clear that the provisions of the Government Resolution dated 06.08.2002, shall be made applicable to the employees of the Zilla Parishad as per their existing pay-scales. In the wake of aforesaid grievance, the rule in that writ petition was made absolute by issuing following direction, which is reproduced as below:-

¶29

“5. It is contended by the petitioner that this Court in several cases, already held that the said employees shall be entitled to receive the aforesaid benefits in terms of the 6^th and 7^th Pay Commission. The present matter is covered by the judgment dated 13/02/2024 in Writ Petition No. 4416/2023 with Writ Petition No. 7634/2023. As such the present petition is allowed by directing the respondent to release the benefits of Incentive Allowance and Additional House Rent Allowance, in favour of the petitioners as per the Recommendations of the 6^th and 7^th Pay Commission w.e.f 01/01/2006 and 01/01/2016 respectively till the date of their retirement and to forthwith pay the arrears of difference of amount of Incentive Allowance and Additional House Rent Allowance, in favour of the petitioners, within a period of four weeks”.

¶30

In the above writ petition, the petitioners had also placed

Kavita

958- wp -4055-24.odt

4/5

reliance upon another decision delivered in the case of Sameer Manoharrao Dakhode and ors. ..Vs.. State of Maharashtra (Writ Petition No.3950 of 2024) decided on 12^th September 2024 extending the similar benefits. This decision related to Zilla Parishad, Yavatmal, as the petitioners therein were working in the Naxalite area and claimed Tribal Incentive Allowance and additional House Rent Allowance and the said relief came to be granted.

¶35

The petitioners in both the writ petitions before us are seeking the similar relief based on the policy decision along with the communication of the State Government addressed to the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Gondia.

¶36

We are, therefore, inclined to grant relief in terms of prayer clause (i) by directing Zilla Parisahd, Gadchiroli, to release necessary payment to the petitioners, within a period of three months from today. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (i) which reads as

¶37

under:-

¶38

“i) Direct the respondent No.1 the Chief Executive officer Zilla Parishad Gadchiroli to revise the Tribal Incentive Allowance and to pay the arrears of Tribal incentive allowances and additional House Rent Allowance as per pay scale of 6^th Pay and 7^th Pay Commission under the provisions of GR dated 06/08/2002 as per letter dated 16/09/2020 and by

Kavita

958- wp -4055-24.odt

5/5

extending the benefit of order of this Hon’ble Court in Writ Petition No. 3837/2021 dated 02/03/2022 and restore the benefit of House Rent Allowance w.e.f. March 2023 along with arrears in view of Revised Government Resolution dated 19/01/2023 within stipulated period”.

¶43

In Writ Petition No.5063 of 2024 supra, a specific direction

¶44

was issued to the Secretary, Rural Development Department to address a communication to all the Zilla Parishad in the State directing them to ensure compliance of the policy decision of the State Government as contained in the Government Resolution dated 06.08.2002 issued by the General Administration Department so that further inflow of the petitions by the employees seeking similar reliefs can be curtailed. The respondent No.2 is directed to comply the above said order expeditiously.

¶45

Both the writ petitions stand disposed of.

¶46

(MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J) (NITIN W.SAMBRE, J.)

¶47

Signed by: Kavita P Tayade Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 25/10/2024 19:53:32 Kavita

Gautam Manohar Landge and Others v. the State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Rural Development Dept., Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gautam Manohar Landge and Others v. the State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Rural Development Dept., Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Anil Ramdas Pawar Vs Union of India, Ministry of Communication Info. and Technology, Dept. of Telecommunications and Ors.

Sunil S/O Baldeo Kharate vs State of Maha., Thr. Its Chief Secretary, Mumbai and Ors.

M/S. Shah Nanji Nagsi Exports Pvt. Ltd., Nagpur Thr. Director, Ashwin Shah vs Director of General of Foreign Trade, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Dept. of Commerce and Ors.

Maha. Rajya Prathamik Shikshak Samittee, Gadchiroli Thr. President, Dhanpal R. Misar Vs State of Maha., Rural Development Dept., Thr. Secy., Mumbai and Ors.

Aspen System and Software, Thr. Its Authorised Person, Mr. Pralhad S/O Narayanrao Lohare Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Urban and Development Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Shripad Masemari Sahkari Sanstha Maryadit, Kopara (Jankar), Thr. President, Waman C. Kamble and Ors. vs State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Agri. Animal, Husb., Dairy Devpt., Fisheries Dept. and Ors.