Bank of Baroda v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition as the impugned show cause notice had already been adjudicated, rendering the relief infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Leave to withdraw granted with liberty to pursue challenge to the adjudication order; petition disposed of as withdrawn.
What the court decided
7.WP.3812-2024.DOCX
2024:BHC-OS:18339
Pradnya
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3812 OF 2024
Bank of Baroda …Petitioner Versus Union of India … Respondent ______________________________________________________ Adv Kumar Harshvardhan , a/w Adv Bharya Varma i/b. Lumiere Law Partners, for the Petitioner.
Adv Jitendra Mishra , a/w Adv Ashutosh Mishra, for Respondent No.1. Adv Yogendra Mishra , a/w Adv Sangeeta Yadav, for Respondent No.2.
CORAM M.S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ. DATED: 11 November 2024
PC:-
- Learned counsel for the Petitioner, based on instructions fairly states that the relief in this Petition is rendered infructuous since the impugned show cause notice is already adjudicated upon.
- Accordingly, he seeks leave to withdraw this Petition with liberty to pursue the challenge to the order made on adjudication.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Bank of Baroda
- respondent
Union of India
Coram
M.S. Sonak
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Jitendra Shantilal Jain M.s. Sonak
- Order 2 — this page · Jitendra Shantilal Jain M.s. Sonak
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court