Petition concerning a One Time Settlement amount payable to the bank; respondents' counsel stated the entire agreed amount has been paid. Court sought instructions from petitioner's counsel and adjourned for directions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3747 OF 2024
IDFC First Bank Ltd. .. Petitioner Vs. The Tehsildar and Taluka Office, Pune and Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Nikhil Rajani, Advocate, i/by BJ Law Offices LLP, for the Petitioner. Mr. Prabhakar M. Jadhav, Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 and 4. Ms. K.N. Solunke, Assistant Government Pleader for the Respondent-State of Maharashtra.
CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR &
RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ
DATE : 4TH OCTOBER 2024.
P.C. :
[ RAJESH S. PATIL, J. ] [ A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. ]
Digitally signed by SNEHA SNEHA ABHAY 23-WP-3747-2024.doc ABHAY DIXIT DIXIT Date: Dixit 2024.10.04 18:10:05 +0530
1/1
IDFC First Bank Ltd.
The Tehsildar and Taluka Office, Pune
Respondent No.3
Respondent No.4
A.S. Chandurkar
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
