Petitioners sought to withdraw the writ petition after settling their dispute out of court; the court permitted withdrawal and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 367 of 2023
Meena
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO.367 OF 2023
ANKUSH RAMA ARLEKAR (DEC) THR. LRS.
Versus MARY DSOUZA @ MARY SANTAMARIA AND ANR
... PETITIONERS
... RESPONDENTS
Mr. Amay Phadte, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Respondent No.1(b) present in person.
CORAM:- BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED :- 16th August, 2024
P.C.:
Page 1 of 2
16th August, 2024
WP 367 of 2023
withdraw the present petition which could be considered.
BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J.
Signed by: MEENA VISHAL BHOIR Designation: Private Secretary Date: 27/08/2024 11:14:39
Page 2 of 2
16th August, 2024
Ankush Rama Arlekar (Dec) thr. LRS.
Mary Dsouza @ Mary Santamaria
Anr
Bharat P. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
