2019 vinita IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT…
Leave to file appeal granted; Registry directed to register the appeal challenging the Magistrate's judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRMA 209 of 2019
vinita
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO.209 OF 2019 WITH STAMP NUMBER MAIN NO.1803 OF 2019 (F)
CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO.209 OF 2019
FREDERICK PEREIRA, THR. HIS ATTORNEY, ANTONIO PEREIRA., Versus
... APPLICANT
THE STATE OF GOA, THR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AND ANR., ... RESPONDENTS
WITH STAMP NUMBER MAIN NO.1803 OF 2019 (F) FREDERICK PEREIRA, THR. HIS ATTORNEY, ANTONIO PEREIRA., ... PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF GOA, THR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AND ANR., ... RESPONDENTS
Mr Ryan Menezes, Ms Gina Almeida and Nigel Fernandes, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr Gaurish Nagvekar, Addl. Public Prosecutor for the respondent no.1.
Mr Sahil Sardessai and Mr Mark Valadares, Advocate for respondent no.2
CORAM:- BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED :- 19th August, 2024
P.C.
Heard Mr Ryan Menezes, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr Gaurish Nagvekar, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for respondent no.1 and Mr Sahil Sardessai, learned counsel for respondent no.2.
Page 1 of 3
19th August, 2024
CRMA 209 of 2019
challenging the judgment passed by the learned Magistrate rejecting the complaint filed under Section 500 of IPC.
Page 2 of 3
19th August, 2024
CRMA 209 of 2019
BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J.
Page 3 of 3
19th August, 2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to appeal should be granted against the Magistrate's judgment rejecting a Section 500 IPC complaint where the acquittal under Exceptions 8 and 9 to Section 499 lacked discussion of the m
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Frederick Pereira, thr. his attorney, Antonio Pereira
The State of Goa, thr. Public Prosecutor
Respondent No. 2
Bharat P. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
