Informant of C.R. No. 120/2023 sought quashing of the crime after settling with respondent no. 2; court found the petition an abuse of process, using crime registration as leverage for settlement. Petition withdrawn unconditionally and disposed as withdrawn.
Petition withdrawn unconditionally with court's leave; no relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AS:34809-DB
rdg 23-wp-3655-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3655 OF 2024
Suhail Akhtar Khan …..Petitioner
Vs.
The State Of Maharashtra & Anr. …..Respondents
Mr. Hrashal Suryawanshi, for the Petitioner. Mr. S. A. Karmakar, APP for Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : 27th AUGUST, 2024.
P.C.:-
by the Petitioner. Petitioner is informant in C.R.No.120 of 2023 registered
with Nehru Nagar Police Station, Mumbai. The investigation of the said crime is completed and chargesheet has already been filed.
1/2
rdg 23-wp-3655-2024.doc
instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the Petition unconditionally.
2/2
Signed by: Raju D. Gaikwad Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 30/08/2024 11:16:25
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's petition to quash a settled criminal case after settlement is maintainable?
Suhail Akhtar Khan
The State Of Maharashtra
Respondent No.2
A. S. Gadkari
Dr. Neela Gokhale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
