Petitioners filed a criminal writ petition. During hearing, the petitioner's counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition unconditionally. The court granted leave to withdraw, and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No legal principles were laid down.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition unconditionally.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Osk 71-Wp-3902-2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3902 OF 2022
Sanjay Shashikant Waskar & Ors.
… Petitioners
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
… Respondents
Mr. Vipin Bidkar for Petitioners. Mr. Vinod Chate, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State. Mr. Umesh Mankapure for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : 26th August 2024.
P.C. :
1) After hearing the learned Advocate for Petitioners at length,
when this Court was not inclined to grant any relief as prayed for, learned Advocate for the Petitioners, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw Petition unconditionally.
Leave granted.
( DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
Digitally signed by OMKAR OMKAR SHIVAHAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN KUMBHAKARN Date: 2024.08.28 10:19:16 +0530
1/1
Sanjay Shashikant Waskar & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra
A. S. Gadkari
Dr. Neela Gokhale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
