4. Mr. Rajput who is the Plaintiff before the learned Trial Court would submit that the first five documents namely Exhibit “50/1” to Exhibit “50/5 are the most critical and crucial documents exhibiting execution of the suit transaction between the parties and the consideration which was exchanged between the parties. In that regard, he has immediately drawn my attention to the Suit plaint which is at page No.30 of the Writ Petition and more specifically to paragraph No.3 thereof which gives the details of the amounts which were infact exchanged between the parties as replicated in the document below Exhibit “50/1” which is the set of 26 vouchers. He would submit that in that view of the matter, the vouchers below Exhibit “50/1” ought to have been marked as exhibits. Considering that all 26 vouchers are the original vouchers. He would submit that the reason given by the learned Trial Court for non-marking of the said vouchers as exhibits is innocuous merely because the description of the suit property i.e. survey number concerned with the Suit property has not been written fully. Prima facie, he admits that suit property is Survey No.131/1 but inadvertently all vouchers have noted and mentioned it as Survey No.133 only.
