Courts failed to dispose of a writ petition on its merits, merely noting a brief procedural undertaking for notice issuance and returning the matter to the file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 915-3596-24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 3596/2024
Project Director, National Highways Authority of India and another Vs.
The Additional Commissioner, Nagpur and others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court's or Judge's orders of Coram, Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. A.A. Kathane, Advocate for Petitioners Mr. Alap Palshikar, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2
CORAM: N.R. BORKAR, J.
DATED : 9th JULY, 2024
The learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to supply the copy of the petition for issuing notice to the respondent Nos.3 and 4. If the said compliance is done, the registry shall issue notice to the respondent Nos. 3 and 4, returnable on 29th July, 2024.
next date.
(N.R. BORKAR, J.)
MP Deshpande
Signed by: Mr. M.P. Deshpande Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 23/07/2024 16:39:56
Project Director, National Highways Authority of India and another
The Additional Commissioner, Nagpur and others
N.R. BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
