Husband sought habeas corpus alleging his wife was confined by her father. On notice, the wife appeared in court, stated she was 19 years old and willingly residing with her father. Finding no wrongful confinement, the Court dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2-wp-351-24.odt
1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 351 OF 20 24
Vaibhv Vitthalrao Dhote -Vs-State of Maharashtra and ors.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
Mr.Naresh Kolhe, counsel for the petitioner . Mr.S.B.Bissa, A.P.P for non-applicant-State.
CORAM VINAY JOSHI &
MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 8th May, 2024.
Kavita
2-wp-351-24.odt
2/2
beginning she is staying with her father respondent No.4 and did not reside with petitioner at any point of time. She has specifically stated that willingly she is staying with her father and expressed to continue to reside with her father.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Signed by: Kavita P Tayade Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Kavita Date: 09/05/2024 17:15:30
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's wife was under the wrongful confinement of her father, warranting a writ of habeas corpus.
Vaibhv Vitthalrao Dhote
State of Maharashtra
Vinay Joshi
Vrushali V. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
