Writ petitions by a cooperative credit society against its members were listed; the petitioner's advocate stated a settlement proposal had been made and the respondent's counsel agreed to consider it and report acceptance on the next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
35-wp3509-2024-wp3511-2024-3520-2024 & Ors..doc
VRJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
VAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV
Digitally signed byVAIBHAVRAMESH JADHAVDate: 2024.05.0216:01:55 +0530
WRIT PETITION NO.3509 OF 2024
Tapi Sahakari Patpedhi Limited, Through Its Manager Madhukar Bharambe … Petitioner V/s. Dhanashree M. Chaudhari … Respondent
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.3511 OF 2024
Tapi Sahakari Patpedhi Limited, Through Its Manager Madhukar Dattu Bharambe … Petitioner V/s. Yogeshwar R. Borole … Respondent
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.3520 OF 2024
Tapi Sahakari Patpedhi Limited, Through Its Manager Madhukar Bharambe … Petitioner V/s. Jitendrasigh N. Patil … Respondent
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.3555 OF 2024
Tapi Sahakari Patpedhi Limited, Through Its Manager Madhukar Dattu Bharambe … Petitioner V/s. Sanjay Tulshiram Mali … Respondent
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.3564 OF 2024
1
35-wp3509-2024-wp3511-2024-3520-2024 & Ors..doc
Tapi Sahakari Patpedhi Limited, Through Its Manager Madhukar Dattu Bharambe … Petitioner V/s. Sharad C. Jagtap … Respondent
Mr. Tejas Dande with Mr. Mulla S. Nabi and Ms. Trusha Shah i/by Shama Mulla for the petitioner.
Ms. Rita Kirit Joshi with Mr. Sunil V. Patil for the respondent.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED : MAY 2, 2024
P.C.:
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
2
Tapi Sahakari Patpedhi Limited
Dhanashree M. Chaudhari
Yogeshwar R. Borole
Jitendrasigh N. Patil
Sanjay Tulshiram Mali
Sharad C. Jagtap
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
