Eknath Suryabhan Dukre v. Regional Deputy Director and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/3505/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Administrative listing order: matters not heard due to paucity of time; interim orders continue subject to removal of office objections within two weeks and filing of affidavits.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Talwalkar .. 1 .. common order 2
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶3
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
¶4
ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.
¶5
DATE :- 26TH NOVEMBER, 2024
¶6
Per Court :-
¶7
- At the time of rising at 6.00 pm, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.
¶8
- In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.
¶9
- Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.
¶10
- The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed
¶11
before the next date.
Coram
AI extract
Ravindra V. Ghuge
Ashwin D. Bhobe
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
23 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Asaram Kanashi Patil vs Education Inspector, North Division, Greater Mumbai and 4 Ors.
Vijaykumari R Yaram vs the President / Secretary, Subhash Nagar Telugu Shikshan Mandal and Ors.
Gajanan Satish Vandarne and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Prin. Secretary, Urban Development Dept. and Ors.
Gajanan Satish Vandarne and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Prin. Secretary, Urban Development Dept. and Ors.