Writ petition disposed of by the Bombay High Court on the basis of consent terms dated 2 April 2024 signed by both parties. The undertakings in the consent terms were accepted as undertakings to the Court, and the matter was listed for compliance on 10 June 2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KVM
1/8
12 - WP 3437 OF 2024.doc
Digitally signed by KANCHAN KANCHAN VINOD VINOD MAYEKAR MAYEKAR Date: 2024.04.04 14:45:47 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3437 OF 2024
Vasanti Chagchand Challani ….. Petitioner VERSUS
Prafulla Swarupchand Shingavi & Ors. ….. Respondents
Mr. Pavan S. Patil for the Petitioner.
Mr.Hitesh Vyas a/w. Mr.Chandrashekhar Yadav, Mr.Rasik Raut for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 2 APRIL, 2024
P.C. :-
Both the parties have tendered consent terms dated 2 April, 2024. They submit that their clients are present in Court and
have signed the consent terms. The consent terms are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. For ease of reference, a scanned copy of the consent terms is reproduced hereinbelow :-
KVM
2/8
12 - WP 3437 OF 2024.doc
KVM
3/8
12 - WP 3437 OF 2024.doc
KVM
4/8
12 - WP 3437 OF 2024.doc
KVM
5/8
12 - WP 3437 OF 2024.doc
KVM
6/8
12 - WP 3437 OF 2024.doc
KVM
7/8
12 - WP 3437 OF 2024.doc
KVM
8/8
12 - WP 3437 OF 2024.doc
the consent terms.
[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of in terms of the consent terms dated 2 April 2024 filed by the parties.
Vasanti Chagchand Challani
Prafulla Swarupchand Shingavi
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
