The High Court declined to interfere with the impugned order but utilized the Supreme Court's decision to grant the petitioner eight weeks to file an appeal on merit without considering the limitation issue.
Grant of eight weeks time to file an appeal against the impugned order without adverting to the issue of limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Revati 907.WP.3360.24.docx
SAYYED SAEED ALI AHMED ALI IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY Digitally signed bySAYYED SAEED ALI ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION AHMED ALI Date: 2024.11.27 WRIT PETITION NO.3360 OF 2024 18:36:07 +0530
Mohammed Hanif Nurani
Versus Union of India
.. Petitioner
.. Respondent
Dr.Sujay Kantawala and Mr. Prathamesh Chavan i/b India Law Alliance for the petitioner.
Mr. J.B.Mishra a/w Sangeeta Yadav for respondent.
CORAM : M. S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ. DATE : 27 November 2024
P.C.:-
1 of 2
Revati 907.WP.3360.24.docx
order for costs. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Interim applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of.
(Jitendra Jain, J .) ( M. S. Sonak, J.)
2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the impugned order in light of the recent Supreme Court decision.
Whether to grant the petitioner time to file an appeal against the order-in-original.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Commissioner of Customs Vs. Canon India Private LimitedFollowed¶12
Commissioner of Customs Vs. Canon India Private Limited (Civil Appeal No.1827 of 2018)
Sayed Saeed Ali Ahmed Ali
Union of India
M. S. Sonak
Jitendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
